ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR’S CONTROVERSIAL SPEECH? — UPDATE 3

Update: There is a copyright issue with the video. I think that surprised even some in the news media. Fortunately, this post includes a link to the text of the speech.

Update 2: Found a different version of the video. Not sure how long it will be out there. Stop the video and restart at the beginning. Barr’s speech runs about 38 minutes. There is some stuff at the end, and that is where the people who posted the video want you to start. Don’t know what it is or why it is there. Admittedly, I don’t have time to listen or read every aspiring talking head, and I immediately discovered I did not like either the humor and the language. I also prefer to debate the issues, not the nature of my political opponents. As the Apostle Paul said, none of us is good. Only God is good. So why bother?

Update 3: This looks more like the university’s official video.

The video below is shows Attorney General William Barr making a speech at Notre Dame University. Best copy I could find. I wanted the whole speech without distracting frills, and this was it. I don’t know anything about News Supreme, and I have not got anything to say about INFORWARS. All I know is that nothing is free. People use videos to advertise.

So why bother listening to the Attorney General?

I read The Washington Times regularly. So, I found out about Attorney General William Barr’s speech in this article, ‘Organized destruction’: William Barr blasts ‘militant secularists’ over assault on religion (washingtontimes.com). Since Barr is our Attorney General, I was curious if Barr had actually made such a speech. So I listened, and I thought it was great!

Prefer to read? Here is the text, Attorney General William P. Barr Delivers Remarks to the Law School and the de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture at the University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN ~Friday, October 11, 2019 (justice.gov).

Sadly, what Barr had to say actually is controversial. It should not be so, but it is. Think not? Read some of these commentaries.

I went out of my way to find commentaries critical of Barr’s speech. Many were laudatory, but those were in the relatively small number of Conservative publications. What many Conservatives did was complain about the Liberal Democrat reaction. What Liberal Democrats did was react angrily or ignore Barr’s speech. Generally, when the news is favorable to the Conservative cause, Liberal Democrats try to suppress it by ignoring it.

So did Barr say anything mean, bigoted, or untrue? Listen to or read his speech. Then consider that it is an important policy statement coming from the top guy in the Department of Justice. Is Barr advocating a theocracy or the protection of our most important First Amendment right? Listen carefully and then decide for yourself.  If you are a good citizen and you care about your family, friends, and neighbors, then you have a duty to listen to Barr’s speech. In addition, you have an obligation to share Barr’s speech with others.

This entry was posted in 2020 Election, Citizen Responsibilities, Constitutional Government, religion, School Choice and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR’S CONTROVERSIAL SPEECH? — UPDATE 3

  1. Tom
    Video is no longer available. ?
    Regards and goodwill blogging.

  2. Tom.

    After reading Barr’s Speech I added as a link to my post King Solomon, Six Alarming Reasons for School Vouchers

    https://rudymartinka.com/2019/10/19/king-solomon-six-alarming-reasons-for-school-vouchers/

    Sad that the news report I read in the Chicago Tribune presented a negative report of his speech. which may be a subject for my next post.

    Sad.

    Regards and goodwill bogging.

  3. Tom,
    King Solomon, William Barr, “Go to Hell?” (Which One?)
    https://rudymartinka.com/2019/10/19/king-solomon-attorney-general-william-barr-go-to-hell/
    Regards and goodwill blogging.

  4. Tom Salmon says:

    Notre Dame does not seem interested in posting the video, and they don’t seem to want anyone else to do it. Why? I don’t know, and I am not going to speculate.

    Anyway, I discovered another copy. You can check it out before it disappears too.

  5. TOM

    I read it from your post.

    Frankly, what I read seems to be what I have been writing about for the last two months on my blogs.

    Amazing, I am now a believer in mental telepathy or perhaps a lot of people are becoming aware and maybe fed up with being on the losing side of the First Amendment misinterpretation to be free to chose religion instead of believing it to be free from religion.

    Regards and goodwill blogging

  6. Tom Salmon says:

    @Scatterwisdom

    Militant secularists are not misinterpreting the First Amendment. They are lying about what it says. Since Barr made that obvious, they are angry with him.

Comments are closed.