Think about that title question. Will we preserve our tradition of the peaceful transition of power? Will we maintain the proper precepts of social decorum?
One of the most difficult things any nation ever must do is choose its leadership. Examine the history of the world. This is the subject of the most bloody and catastrophic wars. Thus, one of the marvels of the United States is that every four-eight years we peacefully choose a new president. The winners of the election celebrate. The losers of the election may sulk a bit, but everyone is relieved that the election is over. We don’t have to watch any more presidential campaign advertisements for another four years.
Is the process perfect? Two lifetimes ago, when Abraham Lincoln was elected, we fought a civil war.
We are not at war this year. We are also not at peace. Instead of the losers sulking over their loss, the winners are angry that anyone would dare to challenge their victory. In fact, this article, The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election | Time, effectively claims that a cabal formed to elect Joe Biden, and that cabal worked to suppress the speech of any who suggested that the election had been stolen. Their excuse? The research of Laura Quinn suggested a way to suppress dangerous lies — toxic content — that might otherwise spread unnoticed.
The most important takeaway from Quinn’s research, however, was that engaging with toxic content only made it worse. “When you get attacked, the instinct is to push back, call it out, say, ‘This isn’t true,’” Quinn says. “But the more engagement something gets, the more the platforms boost it. The algorithm reads that as, ‘Oh, this is popular; people want more of it.’”
The solution, she concluded, was to pressure platforms to enforce their rules, both by removing content or accounts that spread disinformation and by more aggressively policing it in the first place. “The platforms have policies against certain types of malign behavior, but they haven’t been enforcing them,” she says.The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election | Time
In our republic, we traditionally consider suppressing what some refer to as “dangerous lies” as censorship. Instead of censoring our political opponents, we debate them. Yet Big Tech even censored President Donald Trump. Using the attack on the Capitol Building as an excuse, Big Tech completely banned Trump from their platforms, and Congress impeached him (see Text – H.Res.24 – 117th Congress (2021-2022): Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. | Congress.gov | Library of Congress).
Deplatforming did not stop with Trump. For example, even though most of the rioters use Facebook for most of the planning for the January 6 attack on the Capitol (see Capitol invaders aided feds with Facebook posts, analysis finds – Washington Times), Big Tech used the attack on the Capitol as an excuse to shut down Parler Status Updates, a small competitor.
What is the primary charge in H.Res.24? Trump supposedly incited people to riot by lying about election fraud. Did Trump incite a riot? Big Tech doesn’t want us to know, but this website apparently still has a link to the speech, President Trump’s FULL Speech, January 6, 2021 – Washington, D.C. (welovetrump.com). Here is the text, Donald Trump Speech “Save America” Rally Transcript January 6 – Rev. Judge for yourself. Is asking for people to peacefully protest the same as inciting a riot?
As Growing evidence Capitol attack was pre-planned undercuts Trump impeachment premise | Just The News attests, the riot was planned long before Trump spoke.
Is anyone guilty of inciting a riot? How about the people mentioned in The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election | Time? Does anyone think suppressing our First Amendment rights is going to lead to peaceful protests? Are the people who have angrily opposed President Trump appropriate models of public decorum?
Was it inappropriate for Trump to stage a rally on January 6? That is debatable, but the quest for vengeance by his opponents is a despicable, unconstitutional vendetta. To ensure the peaceful transition of power, we have always left those who leave office peacefully in peace. Even though Trump assiduously pursued all legal venues to contest the results of the election, he, nonetheless, left office peacefully.
So, consider the response of Trump’s legal team to the impeachment, Trump: Senate Has No Grounds For Impeachment And Should Acquit (thefederalist.com). Then consider the reply of the House Managers, house_managers_replication_02.08.2021.pdf. Read The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription | National Archives. Where does the Constitution empower the Senate to put a private citizen on trial? Then ask yourself what this about, a show trial? A Kangaroo Court – Definition, Examples, Cases, Processes (legaldictionary.net)? Why?
Look at the executive orders Biden has signed.
- Every executive action Joe Biden has signed — and what they do | US news | The Guardian
- Biden administration to curb ICE deportations of illegal immigrants (nypost.com)
- New Bills in North and South Dakota Would Allow the State to Ignore Executive Orders From Biden (redstate.com)
- AFL-CIO Head Appears Uncomfortable In Axios Interview About Biden And Keystone XL | The Daily Caller
- Mark Levin: The Biden administration is the MOST RADICAL in US history –
- Federal Register :: Document Search
Is it Joe Biden or Donald Trump who needs to be impeached? At least Joe Biden is the president.
Because there was so little concern for following the rules required for election integrity, lots of us think Trump had every right to complain about the election. Is the Senate going to put all of us on trial, or is it using Trump as an example? If our government will not respect the rights of a former president, whose rights are safe?