— Posted by Tom Salmon for Doris, a fellow member of the Prince William and Manassas Family Alliance
Posted by Tom Salmon for Doris, a fellow member of the Prince William and Manassas Family Alliance
Cross-posted at Spirit Warfare.
Well, well, well! The impossible has happened! An inmate in an all-female California prison has become pregnant. She didn’t have a conjugal visit. She had no male visitors. Yet, soon she will deliver a newborn infant.
She became pregnant through a ‘lesbian’ relationship with another inmate. Impossible, you say? Not so difficult to explain, after all.
We’re told every day that whatever a person envisions themselves to be, gender-wise, is real and true. California began transferring state prison inmates who claimed to be ‘ladies’ to all-female prisons. After all, the powers that be dared not violate the inmates’ rights. Some are big bruisers weighing in at over 200 pounds and tall, too. Big ‘ladies’! And they still have all their equipment intact.
Guess what? ‘Ladies’ can still rape and can still father a child! Oh, my. When they saw all the female pulchritude behind bars, they must have momentarily transitioned to being male…for a while. Since their escapades, they might be women again. The news reports don’t specify those details (At least one California inmate pregnant as ‘transgender’ convicts move into women’s prisons – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)) .
Biology has won over the sociological clap-trap that claims gender is in the mind, not the genes! Now will that Cali prison decorate and equip a nursery? They might even set up a delivery room and engage a midwife to attend the birthing.
Transgender kids are told they need to take hormones that will make them more like their chosen gender. Then why not insist that the ‘ladies’ take estrogen, also? It would tame their game and render them harmless. But, of course, we can’t violate their rights, can we?
What about their female prey who tremble with fear and have no place to flee? I guess they’ll have to be satisfied with adopting the new role of motherhood! Just call it rehabilitation!
Prince William-Manassas Family Alliance 
Reblogged this on Citizen Tom.
Immaculate conception perhaps? It’s been done at least once that we know of, right?
@Doug
If you believed in the virgin birth of Jesus, you would not be making such a pathetic attempt at ridicule.
Which is less wise? Putting men in a women’s prison, or believing Jesus was both God and man? Do the people you voted for support putting men who call themselves women in a women’s prison? What does your vote say about you?
At this point my sense of personal national priorities could care less about this at all as rising to some level of national importance.
@Doug
You did not answer my question, but we both know the answer. You voted for some very unwise people. Fortunately, you know it. Now you have to deal with it.
What you’re trying to say, Dad, given all your acquired wisdom, is that I made my bed.. yada, yada, yada.
@Doug
When we vote for bad people, we mess up the lives of lots of people besides our own. It is not just our own bed we make. When we vote foolishly, we risk scattering plague bearing fleas over quite a few beds besides our own.
You did vote for Trump, did you not Tom?
Don’t discuss how I voted here. Did not say exactly who Doug voted for. Focused on the issues. Before we vote, it is a good idea to figure out what matters and why.
I one can’t be transparent to complete strangers on the Internet then who can he truly be transparent to? Uh, huh.
Here’s a piece from my own post from here that explains my vote in 2016….
“In the 2016 Primary the Republicans, in which I was registered back then, was led by contenders Trump and Ted Cruz. I had full intentions of voting for Hillary in the general election and I thought she would be running against Cruz who I thought would be far more formidable than Trump (Trump would/could never win). So I thought to myself, I said, “Self, if I vote for Trump in the primary in order to keep Cruz from running against Hillary, and Trump wins.. then most certainly Hillary would be a shoe-in to win the general. So, my vote for Trump in the Republican primary was to avoid Cruz from running against Hillary, who I preferred as President. Best laid plans…. yada, yada. But you get the idea about strategic voting. It doesn’t always work…. but in the end, it was how I came to use my vote in that primary (which I regret having done to this day).”
Needless to say, my vote for Biden in 2020 was far more about being a vote against Trump.
Original post is here…
https://www.theindependentknight.com/about-the-topic/
@Doug
There is such a thing as being too clever.
The point of nomination process is for each of the competing parties to put forward their best candidates. You attempted to subvert that process. Backfired on you. That sort of thing happens all too often.
Rush Limbaugh attempted to engineer something similar when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama competed for the Democratic Party’s nomination. He thought it made for good entertainment, I suppose. Not one of the better things he did.
The end does not justify the means. You may find this interesting =>https://citizentom.com/2009/07/15/philosophical-confusion-over-ends-and-means/
Subversion.. or to subvert, is also subjective. If you voted for Trump because you hated Hillary then you indeed subverted the process.. if the process is all about voting for the best qualified candidate. I voted for Biden in 2020 more because I truly disliked Trump since before 2016. So by what you are suggesting I also subverted my 202 vote. Biden would make a perfectly proper president, most certainly to stabilize the chaos from Trump. My issues were more some of his democratic policies. A candidate can also be quite capable as a president but not carry your policy preferences. But we are in a different swing of the pendulum these days and a person is vilified personally for his/her policy preferences. I tend to find a compromise/accommodation.. and even that is not popular these days.
@Doug
Different swing of the pendulum? That sounds very much like an excuse for situational morality.
Did I personally villify you? Are you playing the victim?
You constantly vilify “the other” in your politics. You constantly bring religious tones to justify your “vilification”. My statement also implied Liberals vilify as well… but seems you must feel some guilt? 🙂
My “pendulum swinging” had zero to do with ethics or morality… but entirely to do with the shifting winds of opinion and desire policies. In other words.. moments in time cam be cyclical in nature.
@Doug
Insisting that people respect the rights of their neighbors is abusive, I suppose.
Anything good to say about Trump and his supporters?
His supporters are simply misguided fellow Americans. Absolutely nothing good to say about Trump.
@Doug
And you offer what to make your case? Issues with supporting facts? Or endlessly streaming opinions.
We’ve been down this road before, Tom. But let’s make it easy.. read Mary Trump’s book. After all, she’s a psych professional.
@Doug
That’s funny! Pathetic, but funny.
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
Thank you!
Thanks again!