(pictures from Meet Dan | Helmer for VA ( and Harold Pyon for Virginia | HD-40)

The charge of bigotry has crept into one of the House of Delegates campaigns. Dan Helmer for VA ( has accused Harold Pyon for Virginia | HD-40 of sending out a mailer that he calls grossly antisemitic .

Consider what the editors The Washington Post observed.

We have no reason to assume Mr. Pyon, a retired federal worker and former Army medic, is himself an antisemite. But there is no doubt that his noxious mailer is an affront to decency. It also fits a recent pattern among Virginia Republican candidates in this fall’s legislative elections. 

Opinion | Antisemitic mailer in Virginia legislative race follows a recent GOP pattern – The Washington Post

If Pyon is not an antisemite, why would he would he approve sending out an antisemitic mailer? If the mailer is antisemitic, all the mailer is going to do is cause him to lose the election. Yet, The Washington Post says they have no reason to assume Pyon is an antisemite? Are The Washington Post just posturing, playing a partisan game, or are they serious?

Are The Washington Post and Helmer playing race card? That is just as likely as accusations of antisemitism against the Republican Party. It is incredibly naive to believe that either Pyon or the Republican Party of Virginia expect to gain anything by deliberately using antisemitic stereotypes, tropes and imagery against Helmer. However, Democrats have much to gain when they successfully characterize their opponents as bigots.

So, voters need to judge this matter carefully. Was the flier or mailer (actually sent out by the Republican Party of Virginia), antisemitic? Well, people usually run for political office because they think can do a better job than the incumbent, and incumbents tend to object to that possibility. Thus, competing candidates start portraying each other more and more unfavorably.

That raises an obvious question. Did the mailer just point to something that Helmer is supposedly doing wrong, or was it actually antisemitic? Either way Helmer and his supporters are not going to like what the mailer says, and they will condemn it as vociferously as they can.

What is a good test? Until the accusation that the mailer is antisemitic came up, how many voters knew that Helmer is Jewish? After seeing the mailer, without hearing the accusation of antisemitism, how many voters would have known Helmer is Jewish? That is, does the mailer actually contain an antisemitic message, or do Helmer and his allies seek to equate any criticism of him as antisemitism?

In addition, voters need to consider the distraction that charges of bigotry create. Instead of carefully considering and covering other issues, the news media ends up focusing on one juicy, divisive issue, antisemitism. What issues should we be considering instead?

  • Are we getting our money’s worth from our tax dollars?
  • Should we increase or reduce taxes?
  • Are the public schools properly educating our children? Do subjects like Critical Race Theory and Transgenderism belong in our schools? What role do parents have in the education of their children?
  • How can we improve the public transportation infrastructure? Are we allocating funds properly to different regions of the state? What kind of systems should we be building: roads, mass transit systems, or something else?
  • What should we do about increasing crime? Defund the police? Increased the number of police? Alter our laws?
  • Has the state’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic been sensible and effective?
  • And so forth.

When charges of bigotry creep into an electorial campaign, as voters and citizens we pay a huge price. Instead of voting for someone who will do a good job, we have to vote for the least bigoted candidate.

If Helmer’s and his allies’ charges of bigotry are frivolous, we need to punish them at the polls for lying to us. If the charges have a basis in fact, then we need to punish Pyon at the polls for bringing his bigotry into the race. Either way, one of these candidates is keeping us from focusing on good government instead of shameless stupidity.

With respect to the issues, there is a huge amount of controversy, and the political contest has become surprisingly close, even in the northern part of Virginia. Consider.

How are close elections decided? By turnout. To win, candidates must get the voters who would vote for them to actually take the time to vote.

How should we decide which candidate to vote for? We should study the candidates and ascertain which of them is most likely to do what we think they ought to do, and we are here to help. That’s what the rest of this post is about.

Voter Guides for the House of Delegates races are somewhat scarce, but we have our own. See the notice below. Here are some additional voter guides.

Helmer, because he is an incumbent has a voting record, is a relatively well known quantity. Pyon positions, because of poor news coverage and the fact he has not answered many surveys, are more slightly more difficult to discern. Hence, we can compare Helmer’s votes against our own beliefs (see the scorecards below), but we may be a little less certain where Pyon stands. So, if you are unhappy with Helmer and leaning towards Pyon, you may wish to visit his website, attend one of his events, and/or try to call him.

In addition, consider two other sources.


Please link to our voter guides: VOTER GUIDES FOR CANDIDATES RUNNING FOR THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES IN PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY | Prince William-Manassas Family Alliance (

Please post our flyer on public bulletin boards or leave copies on tables so that voters can pick it up and share it:

Want a second opinion? We encourage you to do all the research you can. Check out COMPILING A LIST OF VOTER GUIDES | Prince William-Manassas Family Alliance (

This entry was posted in 2021 Election, Citizen Responsibilities, Legislation, Political Parties, Voter Guide and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.